Saturday, 26 November 2011
Jacob and Esau
The story of Jacob and Esau is full of twists and turns, with human trickery and deception, human triumph and forgiveness. In the midst of these very human, very sinful characters is God who is setting up and working through the characters. The triumph of the story is that in spite of the many human failings and schemes, in the end there is reconciliation. It was no easy forgiveness, no cheap grace, it came, rather, out of suffering, deep discernment and hurt. This is a story with so many layers, so many incredible events. As with Abraham and Isaac, God works with his chosen ones, sometimes in spite of them, sometimes alongside them, and always God's purposes are ultimately fulfilled.
Thursday, 10 November 2011
What's so great about Abraham?
When I re-read the stories of the people who are held up as the great people of the Bible I am struck both by their faithfulness and human failings. Abram (Abraham) is incredible in that he left his home and took his whole household with him to follow God on a promise of a new land and a new nation made great out of Abram. He is quick to follow, quick to give thanks and praise to God. But he, like many that God chooses, is also far from perfect. God saw potential in Abram (Abraham). We are not long into the story of this man, that God is going to make great, before he is telling his beautiful wife to lie and say she is his sister to save his life. What a nice thing to do to your wife sending her to Pharaoh so that Pharoah can have his way with her. God afflicts Pharoah and his household with great illness as a result and in the end Abram, Sarai and their household are set free. Not exactly a perfect happy ending.
The comfort I find in this story is that God sees potential in me as well, despite my failings, despite my ill conceived plans to put my own needs first. God made a great nation out of Abraham, sometimes inspite of him, sometimes because of his faithfulness. God takes us from where ever we are and transforms us just like he did Abraham and so many others who have been born or adopted into his great nation. Sometimes it is two steps forward and one step back, but God is always calling us forward.
The comfort I find in this story is that God sees potential in me as well, despite my failings, despite my ill conceived plans to put my own needs first. God made a great nation out of Abraham, sometimes inspite of him, sometimes because of his faithfulness. God takes us from where ever we are and transforms us just like he did Abraham and so many others who have been born or adopted into his great nation. Sometimes it is two steps forward and one step back, but God is always calling us forward.
Thursday, 3 November 2011
poor animals
I just always feel bad for the animals in the flood. I mean, I totally agree that us humans bring God's anger on us by our actions, but what did these animals do wrong? They were just getting by. As always, I defer to God's wisdom. Maybe it speaks to our connectedness to creation - how humans and creation must share the same fate. But really it's our fault, not the animals.
Maybe I'm a little morbid, but I like seeing these scary, sad parts of the Bible. In fact, a whole lot of the Bible is very hard reading. Like Hamlet or Romeo and Juliet, it's sad but true.
I wonder how exactly we are to take the flood? I wonder if water really covered the whole globe? Was it just that a massive number of people died in a huge flood? And if people started sinning all over again, what was the point of all that carnage? Are we not quite as bad as people were before the flood? Are things a little better now?
Maybe I'm a little morbid, but I like seeing these scary, sad parts of the Bible. In fact, a whole lot of the Bible is very hard reading. Like Hamlet or Romeo and Juliet, it's sad but true.
I wonder how exactly we are to take the flood? I wonder if water really covered the whole globe? Was it just that a massive number of people died in a huge flood? And if people started sinning all over again, what was the point of all that carnage? Are we not quite as bad as people were before the flood? Are things a little better now?
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
Noah and the Ark
Perhaps some of the answer to Ann's good questions about the end of Eden can be found in this passage. I find Walter Brugemann most helpful on Genesis. He says this:
" If the beginning of the flood narrative claimed only that, the text would be flat and one-dimensional. But there are two other matters here that enrich and greatly complicate the beginnings. First, with amazing boldness the narrative invites the listening community to penetrate into the heart of God . What we find there is not an angry tyrant, but a troubled parent who grieves over the alienation. He is growingly aware that the "imagination of the thoughts" of the human heart are iiiirelievedly hostile (v. 5). The conjuring, day dreams, and self-perceptions of the world are all tilted against God's purpose. God is aware that something is deeply amiss in creation, so that God's own dream has no prospect of fulfillment. With that perverted imagination, God's world has begun to conjure its own future quite apart from the future willed by God .
As a result, verse 6 shows us the deep pathos of God. God is not angered but grieved. He is not enraged but saddened. God does not stand over against but with his creation. Tellingly, the pain he bequeathed to the woman in 3:16 is now felt by God. Ironically, the word for "grieve" is not only the same as the sentence on the woman ("pain" 3:16), but it is also used for the state of toil from which Noah will deliver humanity (5:29). The evil heart of humankind (v. 5) troubles the heart of God (v. 6). This is indeed "heart to heart" between humankind and God. How it is between humankind and God touches both parties. As Ernst Wiirthwein suggests, it is God who must say, "I am undone" "
In this passage God seems to have changed God's mind on humanity, and as we move forward we discover that God is not as unchangable and unmovable as some of our categories like to make God. The God of Israel is not static but it some ways like the creatures fashioned in the image of God, "God hurts and celebrates, responds and acts with remarkable freedom," just like those heart breaking creatures called humans.
The question will come up again and again as to why the God of the Old Testament seems so different than the God of the New Testament. God may not be as different as we might think. God's determination to stick with these creatures fashioned after God is remarkable when these creatures disappoint, disobey, walk away, kill and mame each other and the creation, causing great hurt and pain to the holy parent who is God.
Perhaps the judgement we see in God in Eden or in the Ark narrative is more descriptive than prescriptive, something we bring on ourselves.
What do you think? Do you think of God as vulnerable, as one who grieves and hurts?
" If the beginning of the flood narrative claimed only that, the text would be flat and one-dimensional. But there are two other matters here that enrich and greatly complicate the beginnings. First, with amazing boldness the narrative invites the listening community to penetrate into the heart of God . What we find there is not an angry tyrant, but a troubled parent who grieves over the alienation. He is growingly aware that the "imagination of the thoughts" of the human heart are iiiirelievedly hostile (v. 5). The conjuring, day dreams, and self-perceptions of the world are all tilted against God's purpose. God is aware that something is deeply amiss in creation, so that God's own dream has no prospect of fulfillment. With that perverted imagination, God's world has begun to conjure its own future quite apart from the future willed by God .
As a result, verse 6 shows us the deep pathos of God. God is not angered but grieved. He is not enraged but saddened. God does not stand over against but with his creation. Tellingly, the pain he bequeathed to the woman in 3:16 is now felt by God. Ironically, the word for "grieve" is not only the same as the sentence on the woman ("pain" 3:16), but it is also used for the state of toil from which Noah will deliver humanity (5:29). The evil heart of humankind (v. 5) troubles the heart of God (v. 6). This is indeed "heart to heart" between humankind and God. How it is between humankind and God touches both parties. As Ernst Wiirthwein suggests, it is God who must say, "I am undone" "
In this passage God seems to have changed God's mind on humanity, and as we move forward we discover that God is not as unchangable and unmovable as some of our categories like to make God. The God of Israel is not static but it some ways like the creatures fashioned in the image of God, "God hurts and celebrates, responds and acts with remarkable freedom," just like those heart breaking creatures called humans.
The question will come up again and again as to why the God of the Old Testament seems so different than the God of the New Testament. God may not be as different as we might think. God's determination to stick with these creatures fashioned after God is remarkable when these creatures disappoint, disobey, walk away, kill and mame each other and the creation, causing great hurt and pain to the holy parent who is God.
Perhaps the judgement we see in God in Eden or in the Ark narrative is more descriptive than prescriptive, something we bring on ourselves.
What do you think? Do you think of God as vulnerable, as one who grieves and hurts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)